Check the dates on the builds page as evidence, you’ll see the days between posting dropping quite a bit. Since the development team has moved on from a constant drive for backwards compatibility a LOT of great stuff has happened really quickly, with even more coming. All you would ever see is status quo like it was MS Word. This would literally cripple development’s progress on the stuff that is in 2.1+. ![]() There are many changes in 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 and 2.5 which require quite a bit of testing for all aspects of the program in every host, otherwise you see stuff like ‘we no longer have any sort of library’ or ‘the search feature will crash and won’t let you relaunch until you restart.’ĭynamo is now well outside of the limits of just Revit and suddenly you’d see that in a few years team that builds our beloved open source graphical programming interface would have to ‘stretch back’ to work on top of 15 different host builds simultaneously (3 years mentioned * ). And while I am not on the development team, its pretty easy to think through. But there are a few things to consider that eventually turned my mind around, some which i think Thomas was getting at before.īack porting takes a LOT of effort. In fact I lobbied hard to keep backwards and forwards build compatibility. ![]() First up, I get where you’re coming from here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |